CLICK HERE FOR BLOGGER TEMPLATES AND MYSPACE LAYOUTS »

April 25, 2009


You are The Magician


Skill, wisdom, adaptation. Craft, cunning, depending on dignity.


Eleoquent and charismatic both verbally and in writing,
you are clever, witty, inventive and persuasive.


The Magician is the male power of creation, creation by willpower and desire. In that ancient sense, it is the ability to make things so just by speaking them aloud. Reflecting this is the fact that the Magician is represented by Mercury. He represents the gift of tongues, a smooth talker, a salesman. Also clever with the slight of hand and a medicine man - either a real doctor or someone trying to sell you snake oil.


What Tarot Card are You?
Take the Test to Find Out.

Woeser, a Tibetan blogger

Voices of Dissent

April 25, 2009
The Saturday Profile

A Tibetan Blogger, Always Under Close Watch, Struggles for Visibility

BEIJING

WOESER, a Tibetan poet and blogger whose every word is of great interest to the Chinese authorities, described the nightmare that jolted her awake shortly before a reporter arrived for what some might describe as a foolhardy interview.

She dreamed that she was back in Tibet and that an army truck was passing before her, its cargo enveloped in green canvas.

One side of the truck was uncovered, however, and inside she could see a heap of black-and-blue bodies, Tibetans old and young, who had been battered into submission.

Desperate to record the sight, she reached for her camera but it was gone.

“The dream ends with me chasing the truck, wailing and yelling,” said Ms. Woeser, 42, who follows Tibetan tradition of using a single name.

The nightmare vividly reflects the anxiety felt by many Tibetans, both inside and outside China. But it is a particularly fitting reflection of the sense of helplessness that confronts one of China’s best-known bloggers as she tries to chronicle life in Tibet amid a continued yearlong crackdown on dissent.

Her books are banned here, and the blog she has kept since 2005 is currently blocked. Still, with foreign media banned from much of the Tibetan plateau, Ms. Woeser’s blog, “Invisible Tibet,” has become one of the few reliable news outlets for those able to circumvent what is cynically referred to as The Great Firewall.

Ms. Woeser has been kept especially busy by a run of politically delicate dates, including the 50th anniversary of the “liberation” of Lhasa by the Chinese Army, which upended the Tibetan aristocracy and sent the Dalai Lama into exile. This year Beijing christened March 28 a national holiday, Serf Liberation Day, but among many Tibetans it was a time for mourning.

This year’s commemoration was made all the more tense by a security lockdown that accompanied the first anniversary of the riots in Lhasa in which 19 people were killed, many of them Han Chinese migrants.

In the weeks and months that followed, hundreds of Tibetans were arrested; by her own tally, based on accounts of those she said she trusts, as many as 300 people may have died at the hands of public security forces.

“It’s impossible to know the exact number because the bodies are always immediately cremated,” she said. “I am sympathetic to the loss of Han lives, but I am angry at the government for responding with such heartlessness. They have only made the situation worse by awakening the anger of the Tibetan people.”

A graceful, soft-spoken woman whose disquieting tales are often punctuated by nervous laughter, Ms. Woeser has become an accidental hero to a generation of disenfranchised young Tibetans. Like many of her peers, she was schooled in Mandarin, part of a policy of assimilation that left her unable to write Tibetan, and she grew up embracing the official version of history — that the Communist Party brought freedom and prosperity to a backward land.

HER pedigree is all the more notable because her father, the son of a Han father and a Tibetan mother, was a deputy general in the Chinese Army who oversaw Lhasa.

It was only at 24, after seven years studying Chinese poetry and literature, that she reconnected with her Tibetan DNA. During a visit to Lhasa, an aunt dragged her to the Jokhang Monastery, one of Tibetan Buddhism’s holiest sites, and she found herself overwhelmed by the emotional intensity of the faithful. “I was crying so loudly a monk told my aunt, ‘Look at that pathetic Chinese girl, she can’t control herself.’

“It was that moment I realized I had come home,” she said.

She moved back to Lhasa, found a job at Tibetan Literature, a government-run journal, and began delving into the history and folklore of Tibet. In 2003, a publisher in Guangzhou put out her first book, “Notes on Tibet,” a collection of prose and short stories that quickly sold out. It was just before the second print run that the authorities took notice. They promptly banned the book, saying it contained “serious political mistakes.”

In their condemnation of the book, her employer, the Tibetan Literature Association, said she had glorified the Dalai Lama, harmed the solidarity of the nation and “exaggerated and beautified the positive function of religion in social life.” They demanded a confession of her errors. She refused, and found herself unemployed.

With no means of support, she moved to Beijing. After gushing to friends about one of China’s best-known writers, Wang Lixiong, an introduction was made. They married a year later.

In contrast to Tibetan dissidents who agitate from places of exile, Ms. Woeser’s is a rare voice that emanates from China. Robert Barnett, a professor of modern Tibetan studies at Columbia University, described her as “fierce and courageous” but said she was never strident. “She is not a politician but a poet who quite late in her career started talking about politics,” he said. “She is an eloquent reminder of what’s happening in Tibet.”

One of her most startling recent projects is “Forbidden Memory,” a book of photographs taken by her father during the Cultural Revolution. Published in Taiwan, the book provides a disturbing glimpse of the tumultuous decade that destroyed thousands of temples and laid waste to countless lives. There are pictures of trampled relics, jubilant crowds bearing oversized Mao portraits and a female living Buddha, head bowed in humiliation, as she is hectored in the streets. “My father loved photography and no one dared stop him because he was in uniform,” she said.

The photographs also offer a telling window into the soul of a conflicted man. Ms. Woeser recalled her father as a devoted Communist who would publicly denounce religion by day and seek refuge in Buddhist texts at night. After he died in 1991, she found a dog-eared biography of the Dalai Lama hidden on his bookshelf. “He was like many Tibetans who work for the government,” she said. “They are divided inside. We call them people with two heads.”

In recent years Ms. Woeser has become less tolerant of Chinese rule and more vocally opposed to the Han migrants and tourists who she claims have diluted Tibetan culture and damaged a fragile ecosystem. Such outspokenness has only heightened the interest of the authorities, who blocked her first three blogs. (The fourth, she said, was destroyed by hackers.)

LAST year, she and her husband were briefly placed under house arrest after they spoke to the foreign news media.

Her visits to Tibet are even more tightly scrutinized. The police track her every move, interrogating any friend who dares to meet with her. “Most of my friends no longer have the guts to see me,” she said.

During her last visit in August, public security officials searched her mother’s home in Lhasa, confiscating computers and subjecting Ms. Woeser to eight hours of questioning. When she returned home, her mother, fearful for her safety, begged her to pack her bags and go. “That was one of the most heartbreaking moments,” she said.

Most of the news that appears on her blog arrives through e-mail messages or via Skype, the Internet calling service, although they are not without risk. She said 13 of her friends are still in detention, some facing charges that they illegally disseminated details of arrests and protests to the outside world. “Every day I cry because I don’t know what’s going to happen to them,” she said, glancing out the 20th-floor window of her apartment, with its expansive view of a hazy Beijing sunset.

Despite her relatively high profile both inside and outside China, she is well aware that her liberty is fragile. Since 2004 she has been waiting for a passport, which would allow her to travel and speak abroad.

“I feel so insecure inside,” she said. “I feel like I’m sitting on the edge of a cliff and I could fall down at any moment.”

April 24, 2009

real human and everyone else

into the lake at Girl Scout camp with all those shrieking girls
slipped ghostly into person sitting there with the hypnotist
like a Russian hunchback at the junior high dances, me pointing
at the lion on the wall, his cool yellow eyes, and listened to
passing cars, the rustle of leaves

remembered what it feels like to climb the stairs of New York City
so the adult me stepped into my own history saying, “you didn’t”
and my dad would walk along mulling like running water, like
seemed like a tiny stewardess on the verge of a nervous breakdown
you had arranged for this life

hands were still in fists and her face was full of humiliated catatonia
to keep my having read it a secret wavered away and came to the end
of copper oak leaves and acorns into the hands of the oldest person
who would sit at their table like graven images and ruin everything
in a dreadful smelting accident

thin needles underneath the top layer of fingertip skin were stitched
army greens, black greens, lime greens, heathery greens, and red
came to feel just the opposite depression secretly believed around
that people were insensitive shitheads and you were really broke
like that, I heard it with my own ears.

April 15, 2009

I took a few walks around lilac evening fields and then

the recitation of my complaints of an idiot’s ignorance
hands-in-pockets whistling across fields so bitter and
full of turkey sandwiches and Napoleons and chocolate

how high they were when they were only newspaper photos
of hundreds of months breathing and no air coming in
form or style into the sinking sun to the Pacific

summer resort out for a boat that was broken
in place together neatly into the pippin red carton
of French class with anticipation separated from

pretty girls in the office staff down in the lockers
insects in the snow because they were a bunch of wits
wisecracking and ad libbing on all sides

Academy of Incunabular face to lurching car wall
and secretly spitting between the twins swimming
to charge to Brazil with two million in a wheelchair

and they began to realize they liked each other as
this was, by the way, the happiest toys that hit their fancy
with epaulets and all over a sea-crashing cliff or a lounge

of a giant airline in the pool with great athletic forward
room all togged out and stepping fool around the poetry
come out of both ends of a box through slitted eyes

April 3, 2009

The Clothesline Project

The Clothesline Project (CLP) is a program started on Cape Cod, MA, in 1990 to address the issue of violence against women. It is a vehicle for women affected by violence to express their emotions by decorating a shirt. They then hang the shirt on a clothesline to be viewed by others as testimony to the problem of violence against women.

According to the Men's Rape Prevention Project in Washington DC, 58,000 soldiers died in the Vietnam war. During that same period of time, 51,000 women were killed mostly by men who supposedly loved them. In the summer of 1990, that statistic became the catalyst for a coalition of women's groups on Cape Cod, Massachusetts to consciously develop a program that would educate, break the silence and bear witness to one issue - violence against women.

This small, core group of women, many of whom had experienced some form of personal violence, wanted to find a unique way to take staggering, mind-numbing statistics and turn them into a provocative, "in-your-face" educational and healing tool.

One of the women, visual artist Rachel Carey-Harper, moved by the power of the AIDS quilt, presented the concept of using shirts - hanging on a clothesline - as the vehicle for raising awareness about this issue. The idea of using a clothesline was a natural. Doing the laundry was always considered women's work and in the days of close-knit neighborhoods women often exchanged information over backyard fences while hanging their clothes out to dry.

The concept was simple - let each woman tell her story in her own unique way, using words and/or artwork to decorate her shirt. Once finished, she would then hang her shirt on the clothesline. This very action serves many purposes. It acts as an educational tool for those who come to view the Clothesline; it becomes a healing tool for anyone who make a shirt - by hanging the shirt on the line, sirvivors, friends and family can literally turn their back on some of that pain of their experience and walk away; finally it allows those who are still suffering in silence to understand that they are not alone.

October of 1990 saw the original Clothesline Project with 31 shirts displayed on a village green in Hyannis, Massachusetts as part of an annual "Take Back the Night" March and Rally. Throughout the day, women came forward to create shirts and the line kept growing.

A small blurb appearing in Off Our Backs magazine was picked up by Ms magazine and everything changed for the Clothesline Project. In the following years, the Ryka Rose Foundation and Carol Cone's advertising agency took an interest in our work and helped create a national push with small pieces appearing in USA Weekend magazine, Shape magazine and others. This outreach created an overwhelming national response and brought the Clothesline Project from a single, local, grassroots effort into an intense national campaign.

At the moment we estimate there are 500 projects nationally and internationally with an estimated 50,000 to 60,000 shirts. We know of projects in 41 states and 5 countries. This ever-expanding grassroots network is as far-flung as Tanzania and as close as Orleans, Massachusetts.

Survivor = A woman who has survived intimate personal violence such at rape, battering, incest, child sexual abuse.

Victim = A woman who has died at the hands of her abuser.

The Clothesline Project honors women survivors as well as victims of intimate violence. Any woman who has experienced such violence, at any time in her life, is encouraged to come forward and design a shirt. Victim's families and friends are also invited to participate.

It is the very process of designing a shirt that gives each woman a new voice with which to expose an often horrific and unspeakable experience that has dramatically altered the course of her life. Participating in this project provides a powerful step towards helping a survivor break through the shroud of silence that has surrounded her experience.

Carpinteria Library hosts the Clothesline Project

This morning on the way to work I saw all these t-shirts hanging outside of the Carp library. Upon closer inspection I saw that each shirt had various statements regarding violence against women. The shirts were created by area school students for the growing nationwide organization known as the Clothesline Project. It's an eye catching representation that highlights subjects most people would rather ignore than face in our society and world.

Upclose t-shirt designs for the Carp Clothesline Project

More Carp t-shirts for the Clothesline Project

April 1, 2009

Update: PLT

A few weeks back I wrote about a family that calls themselves the Parris Love Tribe. I had met these folks while they were camping in Carpinteria and through my friends Kevin and Angela. Over the course of a few nights we did some cool drumming, shared some food, and talked about a wide variety of subjects from politics to creative expression. Good Times. After the Parris family left Carp, Jeff and I continued to keep in contact through the very mod form of communication known as texting. Now I don't know about the rest of you but my texting ability is pretty weak. I guess most phones made today are set up to text very easily and the phones will even suggest words while one is writing a message. My phone, perhaps due to its antiquated age, does not have this feature and it takes me long intervals to complete the simplest of messages. If you happen to have seen the Julian Schnabel film The Diving Bell and the Butterfly, then you'll know what I'm talking about. Anyway, one evening Jeff and I got into a discussion on creation and destruction. I don't recall how we got on to that topic but I argued that creation and destruction are really two sides for the same idea, while Jeff argued that they were each distinctly different from the other. For me, it was good fun between friends. I thought it was for Jeff as well but developments were soon to transpire that make me wonder now if it was just fun for him as well. A few days passed and life went on until I received this text message:

Did i lose the conversation, with you, as in it is no longer taking place, and not as in a competition.
*text in red has not been altered in punctuation or form from its original
*bold is used to highlight text in some cases

At the time I thought how weird that he should clarify that he did not lose the conversation as in a competition. We're we competing? When I did get back to him, I remember it had been overcast for a few days and I was not feeling much like getting into another drawn out texting debate. I told him as much but he persisted and quickly the messages got weird. Why was it so important that I have that conversation with him just then and at no other time, and why was it so difficult for him to understand my need not to want to get into it? Then I received the next two messages:

Depression is indeed powerful, enjoyable in fact, as I too used to wallow in the web of depression. It gave me an excuse to not engage whenever I wanted. The ability to choose to love yourself is also very powerful. Why aren’t you celebrating life just to be powerful if not for yourself? Enjoy your depression and isola tion. This thing called depression is nothing more than a crutch a vice.

It’s odd for me to hear a buddhist say he is depressed. Depression or Nirvana? You are choosing depression. Does anything you say mean anything is you yourself are unable to choose Nirvana? I live in Nirvana… Always and all ways. Never do I choose depression. Why do you, and expect me to stop connecting with you while you’re choosing depression?


While he agreed that depression is powerful, there was no empathy for those who suffer from it. He also took the stance that depression is what one chooses to do. Why would anyone choose to be depressed? I suppose he believes gay people choose to be gay too. Then this statement that those who practice Buddhism cannot get depressed was really ludicrous. As a practicing Buddhist, I do not pretend to be a perfect being who is not subject to emotional, mental, and physical pain. While I practice meditation and look to the Buddha for his guidance and a path toward enlightenment, I also accept that I am still human. However, we all have our own opinions and this is his, but the next few text messages took on a very judgemental tone.

Clearly you have no idea what it takes to have lifelong friends. Poor Michael. He’s depressed, and I’m supposed to honor and respect his shitty choice. Of course you can be depressed, but why choose it? Life just isn’t great enough?

It's strange because all I requested is that we pick up the conversation another day. However, as he persisted, egging me on with crueler statements, I told him his idea of love was alien to me. I found it deliberately hurtful and cruel.

Your perception of my direct honesty is false. Why do you pervert honesty into hurt and pain? Your perception has falsely become my reality. To explain to you that i never use my energy in hurtful ways is boring. Be loving and hear honesty as love not pain
A lifelong friend would appreciate my efforts of reminding him how powerful he his, rather than cry like a lil bitch.

I know you call honesty rude. Just like all the other average depressed human beings do, as you are now only a victim. Honesty is the highest form of love i can express to myself as well as to others. You are the bull shitter as it were. You are afraid and i am not. No big deal. No judgement. Just looking and seeing. Be powerful not am average s pussy


After the above text, I told him he was acting ugly.

Whose ugly? I have a smile on my face. Why assume? Then, why assume ugly when beautiful is a choice also? Because you are indeed the one who is ugly. You know this victim inside you is ugly. I see you as powerful and beautiful, but you don’t. What can i say or do? There is no tone in a text. Why assume a hurtful tone?

Is it possible he wasn't aware of how mean spirited his words were? Is it possible this really was his idea of showing love? Well, at this point I received a call from my friend Angela (another person to be stung by Jeff's love) and as we spoke for awhile, Jeff continued to text me. The following are the final four messages I received:

You are so arrogant? Giving the silent treatment to love? No wonder love is silent in your life

What do you know about lifelong friends? As I observe you and me, I see you with zero friends that have and always have been there for you and I have three. Why do you argue for your pathetic point of view

Stop crying. You’re alive. You’re breathing. Celebrate life. Pussies are ugly. Lol. Hahaha. Have a boring life without the p l t. L8r


There was actually a small span of time between the above three messages and the final one which must have come to Jeff almost as an afterthought.

By the way, delete the p l t from your blog please

While the above experience was bewildering and disappointing, it did not change my initial experience or what I wrote regarding Jeff and his family in my original post. I thought it sad that he was so embittered from texting that he didn't want there to be any traces left that we had ever known one another. However, editorial control of my blog is solely mine and I chose to leave the original post as is.

Since the above transpired, I have received additional messages from Jeff through the blog's comments feature.

The previous comment was posted prior to Michael's true weak colors shined completely through. The way we receive others is all that matters. To choose to hear hurt in other's words is weak, and we no longer are associated with Michael. We've asked to be removed from his blog, and he refuses to do so. He allows depression to control his actions and non actions, which is the opposite of a lotus. Please, again, Michael remove us from your blog.

The above, I suppose, was to retract/replace the response to my original post about Jeff and his family that he left. Can you feel his love here?

Michael....Please delete the Parris Love Tribe from your blog. We do not want our name associated with a person so weak, a person who doesn't know how to hear or receive love. You are a front. Please remove us.

Thank you

This whole experience continued to confound me. Why has it been so imperative that I remove the original post that, once again, was completely complimentary? Was the irrational concern that someone may have thought we were friends? Does one have to be friends with one whom they have written about? Whatever the concern was, perhaps this post will clear any misunderstanding.

Lastly, I decided to do a little more research into what went down here. What brought out so much vitriol and bitter discord? What was it that Jeff really believes about himself and those around him? For answers, I went to his MySpace page and found a link to an essay he has written called Hope, Control, Common Sense, and a Bowl. In it, he makes a number of statements, some of which reminded me of the Jeff I originally met, but what he has stated about arguments was ironic considering his behavior.

As I remember I can clearly see we are all perfect, as The Creator has made no mistakes. We are shown the beauty of free will and free choice, but are designed to live within the bars of decision, which is not free. Our ability to choose has been clouded through the controlling of a mass. We will argue for the sameness of decision and choice, but we will not converse about the differences. This is a design flaw within our choice making process. We all know that to argue will create an argument, yet we still choose to argue. This is insane, especially when the choice to converse about the differences, which creates a conversation, is there along side the choice to argue. Why choose to say out loud that arguments are no fun, and then choose to argue?

For answers to the question (why choose to argue), I went to an expert on the psychology of those who do so. Deborah Tannen writes in her book For Argument's Sake; Why Do We Feel Compelled to Fight About Everything? that

...perhaps the most dangerous harvest of the ethic of aggression and ritual fighting is -- as with the audience response to the screaming man on the television talk show -- an atmosphere of animosity that spreads like a fever. In extreme forms, it rears its head in road rage and workplace shooting sprees. In more common forms, it leads to what is being decried everywhere as a lack of civility. It erodes our sense of human connection to those in public life -- and to the strangers who cross our paths and people our private lives.

Is this what ultimately happened between Jeff and I? It would seem so.